(Download) "Pogo Holding Corporation v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Association" by Supreme Court of New York ~ Book PDF Kindle ePub Free
eBook details
- Title: Pogo Holding Corporation v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Association
- Author : Supreme Court of New York
- Release Date : January 03, 1979
- Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
- Pages : * pages
- Size : 78 KB
Description
In an action on two fire insurance policies, defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 6, 1978, as denied its motion for summary judgment. (The order also denied the plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment.) Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and the defendants motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted, unless, within 30 days after service upon plaintiff of a copy of the order to be made hereon, together with notice of entry thereof, the plaintiff shall comply with the policy provisions at issue. In the event that plaintiff complies, then order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The action is brought to recover for loss due to fire under two policies of insurance issued by the defendant to the plaintiff covering premises in Far Rockaway, New York. The policies, following section 168 of the Insurance Law, provided that the insured shall, "as often as may be reasonably required * * * submit to examinations under oath by any person named by this Company, and subscribe the same; and, as often as may be reasonably required, shall produce for examination all books of account, bills, invoices and other voucher * * * at such reasonable time and place as may be designated by this Company or its representative". Under this provision, an examination under oath of the plaintiffs treasurer and 50% stockholder was held on June 17, 1975. Thereafter the transcript of the examination was not signed or returned by the plaintiffs officer, although the defendant requested it. The defendant also requested that plaintiffs president and 50% stockholder be produced for examination under oath, [73 A.D.2d 605 Page 606]